Current Edition

current edition

We have all heard in the past number of years how America needed to go “green.” That is, we need to convert to solar, wind and other renewable types of energy to power America. In fact, those who were against coal and in favor of “green energy” even passed laws against the energy source, which really hurt Wyoming.

I, like a number of others, have no problem with renewable energy. In fact, I had a number of acres leased for wind power before the sage grouse became so popular. Now, on the map, those acres are colored green and labeled sage grouse core areas.

In some areas of the state, there are numerous wind farms. There is also a company advertising in Wyoming, hoping to lease deeded land for solar panels. The two things Wyoming is known for are sunshine and wind, but we also like our coal, uranium, natural gas and oil, along with water, for generating electricity. We just don’t like one energy source forced on us over another. And that’s happened to Wyoming in past years.

You know, since the turn of the century, a number of countries, especially in Europe, have switched to “green energy,” and now, according to a column written by Stephen Moore from the Heritage Foundation, those countries are having a green meltdown. Renewable energy just costs these homeowners and countries too much.

In Sweden, they just announced that wind power is so expensive and inefficient the country is phasing out subsidies they have given the wind industry.

In Britain, to comply with renewable energy requirements, power stations are burning hundreds of millions of pounds of wood pellets, most of them imported from America. That could happen in a number of states, especially California, if they keep raising the renewable energy requirements.

In Germany, electricity prices are now three times higher than what America pays for electricity. They have been the world leader in green energy.

Australia’s electricity prices went through the roof this past winter. According to an analysis by the Institute for Energy Research, power costs rose dramatically, from $100 per megawatt hour to $10,000 per megawatt hour. The analysis said this was because of heavy dependence on an unreliable renewable energy source. Stephen Moore wrote that the government had to reopen a shuttered natural gas plant to keep prices from further exploding. This increase caused many energy-intensive businesses to relocate to Asian countries that provide a stable regulation and cost climate with cheaper wages and less red tape.

Moore said that, very quietly, Europe and other nations aren’t going so green any more. The European Union spent an estimated $750 billion on green energy handouts over the past decade, and all it bought them was a doubling of power costs. The good part is that it has given American steel, auto manufacturers, light manufacturers, agriculture businesses and technology firms a big competitive edge in the world markets.

President Trump has said he doesn’t want to go the route that Europe did – good thinking. Wyoming and other states can’t save the world and lose the farm. We do need renewable energy just as we need natural gas, oil, clean coal and other sources. It is time to keep a level head here.

Earlier this month, Brazilian investigators found that some meatpacking houses had bribed health inspectors to overlook the sale of expired meats. The expired meat’s appearance and smell was improved or hidden by using chemicals and cheaper products, like water and manioc flour.

While only three meatpacking plants have been shut down so far out of some 4,000 plants in Brazil, 21 plants are being probed, and 33 employees are still under investigation. Police have accused more than 100 people, mostly health inspectors, of taking bribes for allowing the sale of rancid products. The operation targeting Brazilian meatpackers resulted from a two-year investigation that culminated in raids on processing plants and company offices in seven Brazilian states. So, it’s hard to tell for how long this illegal practice has been going on.

Hong Kong has temporarily suspended imports of frozen or chilled meat and poultry from Brazil, starting immediately. The European Union and Chile both have halted some meat imports from Brazil and China has stopped the unloading of sea containers of Brazilian meat in their ports. China and Hong Kong are the largest importers of Brazilian meat.

So far, America hasn’t reacted, but U.S. Sen. Jon Tester (R) from Montana has announced legislation to “temporarily ban the importation of Brazilian beef to protect American consumers from eating rotten meat.” That sentence came from his press release. One can tell the Senator is from a beef-producing state, can’t you?

Good for Sen. Tester. He stepped up to address the issue. The U.S. now allows Brazilian beef into our country, despite their foot-and-mouth disease issue. Now we’re seeing food inspection problems. That’s not smart.

Brazil is already involving federal police and prosecutors investigating a massive corruption scandal involving billions of dollars in political kickbacks made by construction giants to win contracts with state controlled forms. The Brazilian beef industry exports around $5.5 billion of beef last year. It is an easy target.

Why is America even dealing with Brazilian beef? With our meat inspectors, we know America has a safe product in pork, lamb and beef – what a selling point for the U.S. Meat Export Federation to use. We are proud of our meat. Brazil’s meat issues are American beef producers’ opportunity.

Closer to home, the Wyoming Legislature needs to be sure to fund our meat inspectors that operate out of the Consumer Health Services of the Wyoming Department of Agriculture. There are around 80 meat plants in Wyoming. The meat processed in a state-inspected plant can be sold to any stores or individuals within the state but not outside of the state. There is one plant in Cody that is trying to get United Stated Department of Agriculture (USDA) inspectors, but Wyoming has none at this time.

These state-employed meat inspectors ensure that Wyoming’s meat processed at one of these plants is safe – as safe as America’s meat, born, raised, fed and processed in America.

We stand behind it.



Spring is here, we hope, and we are all wondering what lamb, calf, yearling steer and heifer prices are going to be this summer and fall. Then, the hard part for some of us is guessing what part of the summer and fall would be the best time to sell. What is the best method to use to make that decision? Do we read up all we can on the issue, do what we have always done, flip a coin or shake the dice? Remember, making the decision isn’t hard. It’s living with the decision that’s hard.

Looking over a crop and livestock forecast by the Food and Agriculture Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) at the University of Missouri – and reported by CattleFax – gave some interesting facts.

The report projected declines in corn and wheat acres this spring, but it still sees higher corn and wheat planted acres than what was forecast by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). FAPRI also projected slightly stronger prices for both corn and wheat than what USDA has also projected. As far as net farm income for 2017, the report said that the small jump in grain prices is going to be offset by lower livestock prices projected. That’s not good news.

Livestock prices have held up for the first quarter of the year. In cattle news, bull sales have been strong for the most part, if that is any indication, but there have been a number of forecasts for lower prices, even though beef exports have been strong. 

I always like to watch on Wednesdays and see what the local grocery stores are advertising, as far as what meat is on sale. If it’s beef, I’m always curious what cuts they are pushing. After all, that is the demand or what they have a lot of and need to sell that week.

Each week, USDA releases the featuring activity for the grocery stores. The latest report through CattleFax said that beef featuring in February averaged 5.5 ads per store. This was up from February 2016, with 5.2 ads per store. It was also the largest number of ads in February since 2012 for featuring beef. But the primal weighted beef-featuring was $5.58, down 53 cents from the same time a year ago.

Pork featuring was at 3.3 ads per store, and that was two percent below a year ago. Then, the bad news for beef producers, chicken featuring was at 1.9 ads per store, two percent above a year ago.

Some good news was that in February, 52 percent of total meat featuring was beef ads, compared to 51 percent in 2016. The trend of featuring beef over pork and chicken was strong in 2016, and this has continued into this year.

The report said that the ratio between the composite cutout and the USDA all-fresh retail beef price can give an indication of the margin that retailers have. A smaller ratio indicates a stronger retail margins. The report also said that retailers are finding value in using these meat products to entice customers into their stores, resulting in increased competition among grocery stores or retail outlets.

CattleFax said featuring beef at a higher rate compared to other proteins is a positive for the beef market, but everyday retail prices will need to decrease to motivate retail demand that sustains longer than the shorter-term price.

That price decrease, plus a strong beef check-off, will help get beef prices where we want them.

We have to be careful these days, thinking we may have it made and it’s time to relax and take it easy. That may be the worst thing we could do.

Since an Appeals Court has ruled in favor of Wyoming in the lawsuit concerning the management of the grey wolf and since we have an administration in Washington, D.C. that we hope will be more in tune with agriculture’s way of thinking, we may think that it’s time to snooze. Wrong.

I feel that now is the time to make up lost ground, and we have plenty to make up for. The past few years haven’t been kind to agriculture or public lands ranching, but we need to hang together to get some changes made. It is no doubt that working together and not slinging arrows at each other in the ag or the public lands arena is in our best interest. Our goals and needs for farming, ranching and taking care of our families and businesses are all about the same. It’s how we get there that causes the trouble. It’s kind of like when there’s only one toy dump truck in the sandbox in elementary school. We always lose when we all start drawing lines in the dirt. It’s alright to say what you stand for. Just don’t cuss the other person in agriculture, saying they are wrong. Enough said.

On the wolf issue, just because the Appeals Court ruled for Wyoming, doesn’t mean Wyoming can start managing the wolf today. The Plaintiffs will have 45 days to file a petition to the court describing where they disagree with the ruling, and then the court has seven days to respond to the petition. The bad part is that while new wolf packs are forming and wolves are starting to den in new country, the Plaintiffs could file on the 45th day, and then we wait seven more days for a ruling after that. It’s only after that point that agencies can transfer management. So, we may be looking at a good two months before Wyoming gains control of wolves again. Or Plaintiffs could appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court to override the Appeals Court. That would take years.

Despite all the good news on the wolf issue in Wyoming, we also need to work on the wolf bill making its way through Congress. The U.S. House is okay with it, but, as we said last week in this column, the U.S. Senate may not be. There are just too many Senators without any skin in the game. First, those who want more wolves have been getting to eastern Senators with fake news to get those Senators to vote against delisting bills. Our Congressional delegation needs all the true stories and documentation on wolf impacts that we have. We have those stories, and we need to tell them.

We also need to tell our story on public lands ranching. Even though the current administration is pro-business, the other side is still beating on their doors with their same message, and we need to educate. We have a good story to tell, and to stay in business, we all have to tell it.

We need to work together with our conversations. A good conversation means being able to disagree and still continue the discussion without being disagreeable.