Mr. Big Shot
By Lee Pitts
It seems like we have an expected progeny difference (EPD) for every trait imaginable, from calving ease to ribeye area. But, we desperately need one for how photogenic an animal is.
With more and more commercial cattle selling on video sales and registered bulls sold with a few slides on a screen, how gorgeous cattle are on film is more important than ever. In many instances a picture isn’t worth 1,000 words, but it sure could be worth $1,000.
For 20 years, I was the announcer for a large video auction company which sold over 400,000 cattle a year, and I got to see every one of them sell. One of the things that amazed me was the quality of the film taken by the video auction company reps who had no formal training in videography.
In most cases these were men and women who shipped cattle for a living, and then one day, some auction owner handed them a funny looking camera and told them to go take video.
It would be like giving me a scalpel and telling me to remove a brain tumor. I doubt if I’d have any customers, and yet, these video reps were shooting motion-picture quality film. In most cases, that is.
When I used to take photos of sale bulls, I’d always try to take them standing uphill because cattle look better this way. If they weren’t, I’d just cut the picture on the bottom at an angle and tilt the animal up, making it look like they were standing uphill. Likewise, video reps have their bag of tricks too.
Have you ever noticed on eBay sometimes you’ll see a penny or a quarter in the picture? This is to give you something to compare the size to. One videographer I know does the same thing, except he doesn’t show loose change. Instead, he uses a fence post for comparison.
He prefers to have the consignor flow his cattle slowly in front of a post with about about one foot cut off the top. Or, he’d have a cowboy on a horse in the film that was short in stature and riding a Shetland pony. It would all make the cattle seem much bigger and better.
Whenever he could, he’d also show a few seconds featuring video of the prior year’s calves on the day they were shipped so a buyer would have a better idea of what he or she was getting.
On the opposite end of the spectrum, we had one guy who could gather up consignments like crazy because he was well liked and honest, but his video was atrocious. I recall one set of nice calves filmed standing in front of a manure stained tarp, knee deep in mud. The mud on their bellies must have weighed 100 pounds.
Then, there was this new fellow, Mr. Big Shot, who was evidently too lazy to pack his camera or do much work at all.
Other people may not have noticed, but after a few sales I started to realize every set he repped were Holsteins and appeared to be the same cattle, yet they were supposedly consignments from different dairies I had never heard of. Each set of calves was described as “one-owner cattle,” meaning they were bred and raised by the consignor.
I finally challenged the rep and he replied, “You know Lee, if you’ve seen one Holstein you’ve seen ’em all.”
He kept getting away with it until one buyer refused the cattle on delivery because they all had back tags indicating they’d been purchased at an auction market and were definitely not “one-owner cattle”.
It turned out Mr. Big Shot had been seeing how much he could get for the cattle at the video sale, and then he went out and bought Holsteins that would show a profit. Little did we know, he owned every one.
He tried it one too many times, though, because the market fell about $15, the buyer refused delivery and Mr. Big Shot owned a huge string of cattle about $10 per hundredweight too high. It broke him and we never saw him again.
Oh well. As they say in Hollywood, “You’re only as good as your last picture.”
